JAG Reporter Articles

The JAG Reporter is published by The Judge Advocate General’s School for the Office of The Judge Advocate General, United States Air Force. Use the navigation links to view articles in the various domains: Civil Law, Leadership, Military Justice & Discipline, and Operations & International Law. Also don't forget to explore our podcasts!

Recent Articles

Search

You can sort articles by KEYWORD or CATEGORY. Just type in a keyword or select  a category and click on the magnifying glass to activate the search request (clicking ENTER alone will not trigger the search, you must click on the magnifying glass).

Note: You may need to scroll down the category dropdown list in order to see all of the categories.

 

Articles

  • JAJ Message

    The military justice landscape continues to evolve at a historic pace, but history is clear that a successful military force depends on preservation of good order and discipline.

  • AFJAGS Podcast, Episode 76

    We discuss experiences serving as judge advocates in the United States Air Force, and more specifically, working in military justice and discipline capacities.

  • Spotlight on Stealthing

    The growing awareness of stealthing as an act of sexual coercion or violence coupled with the litigation in our allied countries and the push to pass civil recourse for stealthing victims shows that stealthing cases in military or civilian courts are on the horizon.

  • AFJAGS Podcast, Episode 75

    The historical background and development of OSTC—a major military justice reform required by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022.

  • Building Rapport

    This article will discuss rapport building between the trial counsel and a victim—it will show how a strong relationship can positively affect a case as well as a victim’s experience in the military justice system.

  • Military Rule of Evidence 513

    This article outlines two C.A.A.F. opinions directly addressing Mil. R. Evid. 513, Mellette and Beauge, and the implications of C.A.A.F.’s decision to allow two Army Court of Criminal Appeal’s opinions, McClure and Tinsley, to stand.